Thursday, February 1, 2007

Still Waiting

It's been a day, and nothing so far.

Come on anti-Arya fanboys, quit hiding behind anonymous names and posting your weak arguments in the comments and let's discuss this.

Mister ANONYMOUS thinks he has a case against me, so this is for you ANONYMOUS.

It's humerous that peoples only justification to GzFs actions regarding mine + other peoples banning is "WELL ITS CITIZENS SITE SO HE CAN DO WHAT HE WANTS"... which by saying that, you are basically confirming that you nor anyone else can justify and give a proper reason for a banning.

Honestly, it's kind of childish to censor and ban someone just because you dislike them. When did I ever once state that Citizen COULDN'T ban me? Exactly. There's no one here saying he doesn't have the power to ban who he wants. But by making statements like "He can do what he wants with his site" you are INDIRECTLY confirming everything i've posted here. Banning someone just because you dislike them is the very essence of corruption.

As for people whos response to Anthops infraction being "ITS JUST ONE INFRACTION NO BIG DEAL" right? Just because I mention one happening regarding a corrupt mod decision does NOT mean it ends there. EVERY infraction I recieved was invalid, and I could go on telling you about them. But I won't.

I will mention the fact that just days after I recieved that infraction, I was modded by local forum rat Anga, and this is his reason he gave me:

"You can make comments about their skill all you want, but can you be more mature and not flame the person directly?"

Basically, I made a post about a hotshot who thought he was "pro" and insulted him in the process. Before you look at anything else, think back: I was modded by Anthop and told not to insult peoples skill, but NOW I get modded by Anga saying it's okay to talk about their skill as long as I don't resort to flaming them.

I messaged Anga about this, and the PM exchange we had went kind something like this:

Arya: Hi you just infracted me and said I could talk about someones skill without flaming them.
Anga: Yeah I did.
Arya: But I was modded earlier by Anthop because I was told NOT to insult someones skill.
Anga: What?
Arya: Anthop modded me days ago for insulting someones skill, but now you're telling me I should insult their skill and that's fine as long as I don't flame them, even though the only reason I was resorting to flaming them was because your mod just told me not to talk about their skill.
Anga: UHHHH..... Well the mods don't have two way radios or anything!!
Arya: So...?
Anga: So just live with the infractions they aren't a big deal ROFL!

I could go on for page after page talking about the other infractions or examples of mod corruption that I have seen personally, and I know many people who read this can share their own run ins with the stupidity of the GzF mods.

Case and point is, it's stupidity to say that just because someone mentions only one example of mod corruption does NOT mean there isn't others present.

I'm tired today, so that's all. I'm still patiently waiting for someone to accept my challenge and quit hiding behind an Anonymous name making these witty comments and saying "IF YOU DONT POST THIS YOUR CENSORING ME" Get a life.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hm.... Varwin, I think nobody treated you as a enemy, or 'bitch'.

Like I do care about 'enemy', you know...

no one did like that, and now as you can see, no one is standing against you.

That doesn't mean that you are the survivor tho.....


Find them and Kill them...

If you 'THINK' that 'they' are your 'enemy'.....

Do not have a single mercy.

Not even...

' hah no one is standing against me.. I won! '.

Your battle is endless just like I do.

Before you quit, Kill them and destroy them...

Anonymous said...

You had your chance, Mr. Anomymous, to defend yourself while letting yourself known.

Why continue to hide? If you really want to debate, show yourself!

And, this is getting funny. I was reading some old posts, and apparently, there are speculations that Varwin has posted "pornography" on GZF. This is made out of whole cloth. If you consider her pictures pornography, then...you are just weird.

She was deleted for other reasons, which are yet unclear. Any mention of her on the GZF forums have been removed. Search for her posts; they don't exist.

Saying it's Cit's site means, as Varwin said, you're basically giving him the rights to take your rights away, therefore enabling him to silence the truth to his own twisted version, and grant his mods untold power.

With this, I can see that they will lie and twist things to try to make false points. I'll tell you now. GZF can't withstand corruption. Corruption can only last as long as people don't realize it. Once people notice it for what it is, the seeds of destruction are laid.

There is honestly no valid point ANYONE can make for GZF. I'm almost certain.

Oh, one last thing about the pornography issue. I said this before, and it's worth mentioning again;

Take a good look on GZF. When I browsed through there, I saw a signature with a lightly-clothed woman's chest bouncing, nipples poking through her clothing, and it repeated this. I have seen many suggestive and pornographic things on GZF. They have not been acted upon. Why attack Varwin for "posting pornography" when everyone else does on a constant basis?

That's all. I wanted to do my own attack.

GO VARWIN! :D

-Valor

Anonymous said...

The mods at GZF are nothing but nazi A-holes and are biased pigs. Other posters should have been banned for posting softcore porn but they havent because the mods play favoritism.

Anonymous said...

The mods have been corrupted since October of 06 even.

Anonymous said...

So true...I tried that little experiment I was talking about arya, and recieved three infractions in under 3 hours for mentioning the corrupt swingings of the banhammer lately >_> So yeah, I'm defnitly on your side now T_T

Anonymous said...

I completely agree with you.. the mods are completely biased. I've gotten many infractions for bumping old threads.. However, a different mod claims that bumping old threads isn't against the rules. Why was I infracted 2 times then? And let's not forget the fact that some other more-popular GzFers occasionally bump old threads but NEVER get infractions.

Anonymous said...

Armin is b3st



~BabyLoc

Anonymous said...

"Find them and Kill them..."

Strong Words there. Hehe.